tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808762180086177853.post483961678434594835..comments2024-03-21T06:09:56.335-04:00Comments on WW1L: rtl_power (more modifications)Tim Hhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15081853253958922202noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808762180086177853.post-83166042919307956542014-04-07T08:15:44.711-04:002014-04-07T08:15:44.711-04:00Hi Tim.
About the change to the max sample rate an...Hi Tim.<br />About the change to the max sample rate and its effects: I find it a massive improvement like you say. <br />At the same time there's something i don't completely understand yet.<br /><br />Lowering the sample rate i would expect loosing information and consequently seeing less detail.<br />The charts actually show an increase of detail.<br /><br />Probably I've missed something while reading. I will read again the whole post... :-)<br /><br />Anyway, I think that, for Jupiter at least, there are different storm cases to detect for which different resolutions are needed.<br /><br />Rapid fire storms with reduced bandwidth would probably benefit higher detail - higher sample rate scans.<br />Higher bandwidth storms, with rapidly decreasing frequency should be better covered by lower res - lower sampling rate scans.<br /><br />I will take some time to think at this and then email you :-)Mariohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05545474953268001510noreply@blogger.com